Nature again

While back at Nature, an odd article claiming that the 10 year low in temperatures has done little to allay fears of CAGW. Nothing is cited except two self-referential links. Looks a little self-fulfilling to me.

Perhaps a more useful angle would have been to explain the context of such anomalies to the lay person, and why they (apparently) aren't significant. (Just remember not to make too much of a single record hot year if it comes up in future!)