Consensus?

This article emphasizes the strength of the consensus, even back in the early days.

And of course a refutation of this.

Then a expose of that. Although the source is rather unfortunate. Media Watch tends to restrict its targets to those who don't share its 'soft left' leanings.

Then a commentor on this site - which seems to have some clear arguments for CAGW without excessive name-calling - disputes the consensus by citing these skeptics.

Individuals:

Dr David Legates[U Delaware]
Jorgen Steffenson[Neils Bohr Inst]
Dr Willie Soon[Harvard]
Dr John Christy[U Alabama]IPCC
Dr Roy Spencer[U Alabama]
Dr Neils-Axel Morner[U Stockholm]
Roger Pielke
Robert Balling[U Arizona]
Richard Lindzen[MIT]IPCC
William Gray[U Colorado]
Patrick Michaels[U Virginia]
Pr Paul Reiter[Pasteur Inst]IPCC
Pr Ian Clark[U Ottawa]
Pr S I Akasofu[Arctic Research Centre]
William Kinimonth[Aust Meteor]
Dr Eugenio Hackbart[Brazil]
Dr David Douglas[U Rochester]
Dr Tim Patterson[U Carleton]
Dr Tad Murty[U Carleton]IPCC
Dr Vincent Gray[NZ]IPCC
Dr Jan Vizer[U Ottawa]

Note 5 who are/were in the IPCC.

Groups:

1]The 1992 Statement by Atmospheric Scientists[47 names]
2]The Leipzig Declaration
3]The Heidelberg Declaration[4600 names]
4]The Oregon Petition[31,000 names]

There were of course some dud names in the Oregon Petition, but apparently it's now cleaned up and represents genuine dissenters.