This bloke's a geologist. Does that mean his opinions are suspect (minerals etc)? The figures sure don't look made up, but how would I know?
But would he really stake his professional reputation on a statement such as 'No tangible, physical evidence exists that proves a cause–and–effect relationship between global climate changes and atmospheric CO2' for a few bucks, or might this be his real conclusion?
In another article he predicts 40 years of cooling.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment